<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514966116735614515.post3227052244787055439..comments</id><updated>2009-01-20T12:52:58.473+01:00</updated><category term='tools'/><category term='documentation'/><category term='revision control'/><category term='neo4j'/><category term='maven'/><category term='eclipse'/><category term='rdbms'/><category term='set based'/><category term='open source'/><category term='neoclipse'/><category term='api design'/><category term='graph database'/><category term='database'/><title type='text'>Comments on Moving forward: Aging databases and relationships</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.nawroth.com/feeds/3227052244787055439/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5514966116735614515/3227052244787055439/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.nawroth.com/2009/01/aging-databases-and-relationships.html'/><author><name>Anders Nawroth</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02538334376288340169</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_sm_3KdSgQMg/SwcUNy7pd9I/AAAAAAAAAGw/_SeaJCRqF8Q/S220/avatar.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514966116735614515.post-958728543015305978</id><published>2009-01-20T12:52:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2009-01-20T12:52:00.000+01:00</updated><title type='text'>I agree entirely. It has often seemed to me that f...</title><content type='html'>I agree entirely. It has often seemed to me that foreign keys constraints in RDBMS systems are little more than a hack to improve what are basically spreadsheets. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I am very glad that proper relational systems such as Neo4J are becoming viable.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5514966116735614515/3227052244787055439/comments/default/958728543015305978'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5514966116735614515/3227052244787055439/comments/default/958728543015305978'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.nawroth.com/2009/01/aging-databases-and-relationships.html?showComment=1232452320000#c958728543015305978' title=''/><author><name>Alastair James</name><uri>http://onewheeledbicycle.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.nawroth.com/2009/01/aging-databases-and-relationships.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514966116735614515.post-3227052244787055439' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5514966116735614515/posts/default/3227052244787055439' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1066384313'/></entry></feed>
